In my essay, I will first give a brief analysis of what the case is all about. Following this, I will discourse why I think McDonalds was inwardly their rights, and I will defend McDonalds against any possible criticism, as discussed in the lectures. I will also argue that the childrens rights have actually non been violated in this case, and I will show why. I will then end with how the Free Market theory applies to this case.
A New York metropolis lawyer by the name of Samuel Hirsch filed a class-action lawsuit against whizz of the leading fast-food giants, McDonalds. He had argued that the high fat content of McDonalds food caused serious medical problems such as obesity, diabetes and some other health related problems for the plaintiffs children. Samuel also argued that McDonalds failed to go away nutritional information to the public.
The plaintiffs believed that these issues were enough grounds to prove their children became oer cargo and ill by McDonalds negligence. U.S. District justness Robert Sweet ruled in favour of McDonalds. There was not enough evidence to show that McDonalds food compound a danger that is not within the common experience of consumers.
I believe McDonalds was most definitely within their rights in regards to the complaints made by the plaintiffs. McDonalds should not be held responsible for others uncontrolled behaviour when it comes to eating fast-food. If McDonalds were held liable for peoples weight gain, then there would be many fast-food companies that would be sued for the fat person foods they offer. McDonalds duties to the...If you want to get a full essay, rescript it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment