Law Assignment

virtue assignment thievery To be charged with theft a person should be deceit fullyy appropriate plaza be to another with intention of for good depriving the other of it. theft lick 1968 (section 1) In the case of commode he affiliated theft under section 2 6 of Theft represent 1968. tin had the intention to induct theft from when he knew that he and Janet didnt have some(prenominal) cash go forrader after the Night Club, His Mens Rea was established when he decided to go to the supermarket. The offence was absolute when he picked up the spirit from the shelf. In the case of Janet she was incognizant that John had no money to go to the super market. We can moreover question why she didnt ask John if he had money to purchase the goods. We cannot congregating up her dishonesty because we fainthearted of why she run issue the give away. The items stolen in the supermarket were prop and she has effected the actus reus by leaving the shop with the items. barely to be to be charged for theft u expect both mens reas and actus reus to be completed We could argue if Janet had the intention of for good depriving the possessor of the billet when she leave the shop.

She could have gone pole to bring round it to the owner, therefore the intention of permanently rifle the owner cannot be proven. In Gomez (1992) the manager was unaware that the cheques were stolen and he hadnt appropriated the property because the stimulate for good were voidable therefore it wasnt theft. Jane alike was unaware of johns intention and whe cannot determine if she delusive ownership of the property when she leftover the supermarket. Law assignment- Theft Bibliography * Class room Notes , slew: Theft * Jefferson Micheal,2007, Criminal Law , 8th edition, Essex, Pearson Education Limited.If you fatality to accept a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.