Arriving an Explanation of Truth within Human Mind

such(prenominal) universal truths that provided this mavin between individuals and the universe were based on Enlightenment notions that man's leave is aimed at developing a rational culture and society. Such philosophers as these believed that man's capacity to reason reveals truth; that individuals and humanity make grow toward perfection, and that men are equal with respect to rationality and deserve equality before the law and individual freedom. Marx saw this an earlier an opiate of the people, because from his observation of the forces of production and class divisions, he did not take hold of man nor his societies evolving toward any such ideal or high understanding. Kant's transcendentalism was based on the following question: "Whether in that location is any knowledge that is independent of experience and even of al mavin impressions of the senses. Such knowledge is entitled a priori," (Edwards, p. 686). Marx's theory of transcendentalism, to be discussed later, radically differs from Kant's metaphysical view and a priori knowledge.

Hegel believed reality was a dynamic process that evolved through dialectic not one of static ideals of absolutes. He well- kept that every thesis has an immanent antithesis within it, and that the conflict between these results in a subtraction which again evolves a contradiction. Hegel believes that this cyclical conflict eventually resul

ts in the stability of societies and genial transformation. Marx was greatly influenced by Hegel's dialectic, but he fashioned it into a dialectic materialism in the sense that he did not guess the conflict viewed by Hegel as leading to reason, freedom and social change. Instead, he felt that economics and the economic stratification of society are the basis of history and dictate all social, policy-making and intellectual aspects of life, including religion and religious set. Hegel and Marx were similar in accept that the real higher indorsement in human domain was the state, something that would be used by Hitler and incorporated into Nazi ideology in a way that lent divine qualities to the dictator.

Hegel maintained that all morality and religion is a product of the state, a body of appeal to which in that respect is no higher authority. As Lavine (p. 240) argues, "In the philosophy of Hegel, there is no moral authority above the state. There are no moral or legal or religious principles that transcend the state. Beyond the state, there is no higher court of appeal." It is from this that the individual forms his own notions of morality, religion, and beliefs, which is why Marx viewed this philosophy and Kant's as being bourgeois, since it enslaved the morality of the masses to the values dictated by the ruling elites.

Lavine, Ted C. From Socrates to Sartre: The Philosophic Quest. New York: footling Books, 1989.

Across Europe during the Enlightenment, philosophers were focused on a critical review of life from an essentially nonsectarian perspective and without any particular(prenominal) or universal purpose. Many were reformists, intending to enlighten men so as to spur them to break free of slavish colony on the past and its traditions. Kant, however, as a devout Christian, had an unshakeable doctrine and affirmed the existence and importance of God, whereas Marx considered religion the opiate of the people that kept them in check from rebelling against the upper clas
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.